Jérémie Chassaing
Jérémie Chassaing
Nope, the PR has not been merged 😢
This seems to break all code coverage tools (using coverlet in my case)
Yes that would be definitely doable to pass only on fsx file, especially if its standalone.
Super happy that it's useful for you. I've not ported all FSharp.Core yet, this is a lot of work, but don't hesitate to contribute. I was thinking also about integrating...
For now, yes. I think ultimately it should be generated by compiling Fable.Core in Php, and put in a Composer package, but it's not done yet.
This is totally intentional. In the functional version, no need for base class.
You can read more about functional eventsourcing here: http://thinkbeforecoding.github.io/FsUno.Prod/Why%20FSharp.html
Right ! I change this soon, thx. Didn't notice this one :grin:
Maybe I can start 2 versions of FsUno.. One being very lean to show the shortest way to functional event sourcing. One other presenting alternatives,and enhancements. the second one would...
Yes, I think so. Async only. No reason for making it sync. And I would leave only the sync part in the first one. I'll try to make the split...