Arm Patinyasakdikul comments

Results 19 comments of


                                            Arm Patinyasakdikul

Using Typescript for better type checking

Yeah, good suggestion. Only thing is I dont know anything about TS. It seems people really wants to go for it. Good. Please open a PR.

db_service

ถ้าเราทำ field ไว้เผื่อทำ oauth ด้วยก็น่าจะดี

@songyoskeng We have event emitter functionality from `9armbot.js` through our `webapp`. This has been done through socket.io already. We just need another page to display the dashboard. I am looking...

Market Dashboard

For a smaller project, #22 is a good starting point. We already have gif/alert webapp that we can modify to fit our goal.

error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or 'attribute' before 'int'

@hjelmn I'm not sure how this does become a problem? Does our configure missed `OPAL_C_HAVE__THREAD_LOCAL` define or we put the wrong check? @abeltre1 What compiler are you using? You can...

error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or 'attribute' before 'int'

I'm waiting for @hjelmn to pitch in on this. He said that ICC support for c11 atomic is kinda weird right now. So I'm not sure if the patch will...

[Issue]: Why does reducing stack size decrease kernel launch overhead?

Hi @csehydrogen , can you still reproduce this with the latest ROCm and RCCL? I took the reproducer and unable to reproduce it on MI300X (similar time for different stack...

[Issue]: Why does reducing stack size decrease kernel launch overhead?

reproduced with MI250X. ``` Stack size: 684, Time: 12183 ns Stack size: 685, Time: 12438 ns Stack size: 686, Time: 12286 ns Stack size: 687, Time: 12272 ns Stack size:...

[Issue]: Why does reducing stack size decrease kernel launch overhead?

Thank you for confirmation. We are aware of this issue on MI100/MI200 series and working on a fix. In the meantime, we recommend to NOT use indirect function call in...