Theo Dumitrescu

@m-reza-rahman is this a valid backlog?

So for Jakarta 8 we are introducing the new features form Java 8 and the Jakarta 9 version will require Java 11+, right?

@m-reza-rahman this can be close. After I'll do some test with the embedded we can discuss again about adding it or not

Hi, I'm also looking for this feature. Did someone find a solution?

Why are you saying that you have to re-implement FutureImp? I'd like to give a try to this issue. It should work using [shutdown hooks](https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/java/lang/Runtime.html#addShutdownHook-java.lang.Thread-). From Java Concurrency in Practice,...

Hi Daniel 😄 I like your second proposal. Actually both variants looks good to me, but personally I'll use more the second one (through function concatenation I could do a...

> the user needs to keep in mind that they might change if their function isn't pure. I strongly agree. Here we are focusing on pure data-structures and pure functions,...

This is because during the type inference of For there isn't a type R provided. Therefore for Java, your code is like `public static Function For(Future f1, Future f2)` Anyway,...

+1 I asked some colleagues about this question, without mentioning the issue, and everyone was expecting a builder for java.net.Uri or at least the support for file://