Thad Guidry

@tfmorris and @ostephens Do you think this would close that linked issue?

OK, I think this is now ready for final review and merging. I've fulfilled all of Tom's suggestions: - moving admonition about date/time handling changes since 3.0 into only `toString()`...

@wetneb We can close the OpenRefine issue #6009 if you can review and agree with my last comment and we merge this? Looks good?

@wetneb Better? I reverted that 1 note.

Let's leave it under `toString()` , Tom had a good point that the changes he did actually fall under `toString()` changes anyways, so that's where any regession would be impacted...

My opinion from the sidelines here. Goal posts are goals. Think "We want to go to the moon." In order to accomplish that goal, everyone agrees that lots of work...

I have to admit with @Abbe98 's last point, that even I am questioning what can/cannot the Advisory Committee do. Maybe their role should be to only advise maintainers, community/project...

@Abbe98 that's not correct and maybe your mixing "extensions" with "distributions", maybe not? In that #6725 in the project's repo, looks like we only asked for authors of "extensions" to...

@Abbe98 Don't worry so much about the Advisory Committee... they can only advise us. We as a community make the ultimate decision on the project and its website (also in...

From @asengupta the note they had in their [Figma](https://www.figma.com/board/ySwg52nUCbZArlsDwKAKw0/OpenRefine-Heuristic-Analysis?node-id=1-209&t=twpIYNTQG0sMmxpy-0) was: >**Website:** >**Download thank you page** >Next steps section could support onboarding new users more > >Possible solutions > - Add...