Taylor G Smith
Taylor G Smith
I think some of the recent changes in #359 and #361 might help with this. Hoping to get v1.7.0 out in the near future.
Still would like to see this get added at some point 😬 Will try to find time soon..
Hmm this is pretty interesting. Could you by chance share a data snippet for me to tinker with? I like the idea of this a lot
Thanks for this very well-documented request. This is certainly something we can add to the doc for future users who stumble onto similar issues
Thanks for the willingness to contribute the code! This would be a good feature
Cool, thanks @christopher-siewert . We should be able to access those methods through the results wrapper we get back from the fitted statsmodels model ```python model.arima_res_.model # the original model...
Thanks for the issue! This seems very reasonable. Would you be interested in contributing the feature? I agree calling with the `arima_res_` is not ideal, but it's a good work-around...
Hi @claudia-hm sorry for the late reply. I'm looking into this. First thing I notice is a peculiar statsmodels warning when I enable the trace on the fit: ```python In...
Thank you for pointing this out. We will have this fixed in the next release.
Could you please provide a sample of data that reproduces this issue?