Alex Cameron

I'm working on some unit tests now.

CC: @ret2libc @woodruffw @haydentherapper

> The only differences I see is the naming, and that PublicKeyDetails also indicates the encoding of the public key material, but I would think that it wouldn't really matter,...

> Yeah, adding the new values missing in PublicKeyDetails is preferable IMHO. The old RSA values can be marked as [deprecated = true]. I believe RSA are the only ones...

> My gut feeling is that this will be quite disruptive for the community, as this field is being used in quite a few places. And it would also require...

> See [sigstore/protobuf-specs#212](https://github.com/sigstore/protobuf-specs/pull/212) for PR on merge of `PublicKeyDetails` and `KnownSignatureAlgorithms`. Nice work, thanks for that. Once a release is cut, I'll get this PR up to date.

Awesome, thanks for the details @haydentherapper. Since we're supporting configurable client signing algorithms only as a first pass, I believe that we can kick the can down the road and...

@ryanmkurtz That repo was created by my colleagues and I, and is what lead me to file this issue to begin with. It's been useful to us but, in my...

Working on this now.

Looks like GitLab OIDC is on its way too: https://github.com/sigstore/fulcio/pull/983