Thomas Pollerspöck

Hi both, thank you for your comments. Looks like I wait for a solution for this issue. Please inform me when a solution is there. I would support testing. You...

Dear @pekkaklarck , thank you for your detailed answer. No problem about the delay. I hope you had a nice time with your family. Thank you also for your proposals...

Dear @pekkaklarck , We remain very interested in having this feature integrated into the Robot Framework core and would like to explore the possibility of continuing our discussion on this...

Dear @pekkaklarck , thank you for your spent efforts. We analyse your extensive response and if we still feel it's required we come back with a discussion in slack devel...

Thank you for the information. We will need some time to analyze your previous response. We will also consider your last response. Then we come back to you.

Would it be good to deactivate the pipe-separated format by default. This avoids that new projects / users use it. A commandline / config parameter could allow to activate it...

Yes it's a huge task, and it needs time to trust the implementation. It needs time to stabilize this feature. What is working for us and what we already implemented...

In the meanwhile (we watch Robot Framework since around 5 years) the robot language is quite a full programming language. **Therefore I propose that threading relevant functions should be also...

@pekkaklarck , @franzhaas , thank you for all your input. I will be in Christmas holiday for two weeks. After this I will directly process your questions and proposals. Did...

I got your point. We will workout a design document with explanations and background information beginning of next year. Nice time!