Helmut K. C. Tessarek

I looked at the code and I am even more confused now than I was before. It seems that `duplicate_files` only works iff you do not send an expiry date...

> I think this was intended - since the other file has an expiry date it is "not the same" as the other file. It should be nice to document...

> other tests use string comparison, so it should be an easy fix. Still, it probably won't change the fact that it weirdly fails on gh. ok, I see what...

It almost seems that on gh either one of the following is ignored: - `config.paste.duplicate_files = Some(false);` - that the default for `default_expiry` is not set P.S.: The fixture also...

I ran a few tests here #259 and it seems that tarpaulin has a side effect and makes that particular test fail. I've opened an issue with tarpaulin: https://github.com/xd009642/tarpaulin/issues/1488

Since my PR was merged, an `.await` haa to be added to the `glob_match_file`. However, something is wrong after you force pushed. The changes that were merged from master by...

@RealOrangeOne can you merge the changes in master back into this PR, change the one call to use `.await`, so that we can run the tests. Or you can give...

The tests in `paste.rs` are missing the `.await` for the `store_file` call. What is strange though is that this was not caught by the lints. P.S.: Why on earth would...

Wait, I might have checked the wrong branch. Give me a sec. One test fails though.

ok, so I ran your branch locally and the tests pass. But on the ci the following happens: ``` thread 'paste::tests::test_paste_data' panicked at src/paste.rs:346:9: ```