tesseract icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
tesseract copied to clipboard

ROS Buildfarm Release "Noetic and Foxy"

Open Levi-Armstrong opened this issue 4 years ago • 11 comments

Noetic:

  • [x] ros_industrial_cmake_boilerplate
  • [x] opw_kinematics
  • [x] osqp
  • [ ] osqp_eigen
  • [x] qpOASES
  • [ ] tesseract

Foxy

  • [ ] ros_industrial_cmake_boilerplate
  • [ ] opw_kinematics
  • [ ] osqp
  • [ ] osqp_eigen
  • [ ] qpOASES
  • [ ] tesseract

Levi-Armstrong avatar Jan 11 '21 01:01 Levi-Armstrong

@mpowelson, @marip8 and @johnwason I believe this repository is ready to be released. Any objections to me releasing this repository for Noetic with tag 1.0.0?

Levi-Armstrong avatar Apr 08 '21 00:04 Levi-Armstrong

I am going to try a conda build tonight, let's make sure it will work there.

johnwason avatar Apr 08 '21 01:04 johnwason

No, it isn't building using conda on windows. I can't look into this until the week after next most likely. We can add patches later to the conda package if needed, or wait until the conda build is working.

johnwason avatar Apr 08 '21 01:04 johnwason

I'm on board for the release. As far as I can tell it looks like the major discussions about de-coupling the planning/visualization code have been addressed and there aren't any outstanding PRs with major changes.

What is your tagging strategy? Are the 0.x.x tags supposed to represent pre-release states and 1+.x.x represent post-release states? Just wondering if the next tag should be 0.3.0 since there really hasn't been a "major" change since the last tag

marip8 avatar Apr 08 '21 13:04 marip8

What is your tagging strategy? Are the 0.x.x tags supposed to represent pre-release states and 1+.x.x represent post-release states? Just wondering if the next tag should be 0.3.0 since there really hasn't been a "major" change since the last tag

Going to 1.x immediately may indeed not be what you'd want.

If you're going to use semver, seeing a 1.x release implies quite a few things.

gavanderhoorn avatar Apr 08 '21 14:04 gavanderhoorn

I think I agree that a 0.x release might be a better option right now. Then if that goes well we can plan on a 1.0 release sometime soon.

mpowelson avatar Apr 08 '21 16:04 mpowelson

@gavanderhoorn, @mpowelson, @marip8 and @johnwason Thank you all for the input. I will begin the release process and use tag 0.4.0.

Levi-Armstrong avatar Apr 08 '21 17:04 Levi-Armstrong

Just submitted the release on the ROS buildfarm.

Levi-Armstrong avatar Apr 10 '21 02:04 Levi-Armstrong

@johnwason Everything has been upgraded to taskflow v3.0.0.

Levi-Armstrong avatar Apr 14 '21 13:04 Levi-Armstrong

@Levi-Armstrong ok I'll give the conda build another try

johnwason avatar Apr 14 '21 22:04 johnwason

The release status can be tacked here.

Levi-Armstrong avatar Apr 23 '21 22:04 Levi-Armstrong