Ted Harrison

Hi @dcooper16, thanks for the clarification on whether the author should be included in this reference. We did some research on this issue to try to understand where this author...

Hi Carsten. With regard to following what is available in NIST citation data: I agree with the sentiment, however consider the following: - [CMOS](https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/book/ed17/part3/ch15/psec012.html) offers the following guidance for providing...

@CxRes Sorry for the late response. WHATWG has confirmed that the template I provided for WHATWG Living Standards is an acceptable format. That is (using URL Pattern as an example):...

@CxRes with regard to your issues with XML: if you aren't able to find the solution on [authors.ietf.org](https://authors.ietf.org/en/getting-help), feel free to email [email protected] or reach out to some of the...

> I see following comments in the IEEE adapter[1](#user-content-fn-1-e00772b183b27d53db87035354f9b772): > > ``` > Resolves IEEE documents via paths prefixed with ``R.``, > which are considered reliably formatted but are not...

We use the latest version URL provided by W3C. For example: https://www.w3.org/TR/xml/ So using that XML template for the W3C.REC-xml-20060816 example should look something like this: ```xml Extensible Markup Language...

Apologies, just realized you may have been referring to references like [this](https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml4/reference.W3C.xml.xml): ```xml Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Fifth Edition) ``` In this case we would update like this: ```xml...

> For the example `W3C.REC-xml-20060816`: > > This is the source file (in [relaton](https://www.relaton.org/)): https://github.com/ietf-tools/relaton-data-w3c/blob/main/data/rec-xml-20060816.yaml > > This doesn't have any record of the latest URL. So this will require...

> I assume W3C REC (docstatus: recommendation) will be W3C Recommendation. That's correct. > Are there any other values that can be expected for refcontent? From a search of the...