anatoly techtonik
anatoly techtonik
@simevo thanks for packaging it for Debian. I deliberately avoided `setup.py`, because I think it is anti-pattern to embed package metadata into executable script. It is hard to parse, hard...
Found https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0517/ for alternative format of source packages without `setup.py`. Can Debian Python Policy adopt it? I can move to this format as well, but as you already found out...
@rhinoceros tests on Python 3 don't pass with this commit, so it is unlikely to be merged. Can you provide the diff file and describe how did it? If it...
Is there any way to just expose settings for static analysis? As for styleguide, I like this point https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/#a-foolish-consistency-is-the-hobgoblin-of-little-minds
I mean expose those setting on the project/library level, so that code is not modified with comments.
Why wheels? The code is binary independent, so no wheels are required..
Thanks for the info. I don't think that there is big win in speed, but I agree that getting rid of `setup.py` is a big deal. Caching can be a...
But current .zip files are executable. You don't even need to install them to use. =(
@graingert sorry, didn't want to discourage you, it is all health problems, the lack of employment and money that make me mean. If you want a deeper discussion with problems...
If Tidelift approves this package for subscription, I will look into altering `pypack` to produce wheels instead of intermediate .zip files.