Timothy Clem

Definitely start with a tree-sitter parser. > After that, the hardest part begins - implementing the semantic part This is about to get much, much easier as we are almost...

> Is the new path for supporting languages available soon? I don't have a specific timeline to give you, but you can see an [example for java](https://github.com/tree-sitter/haskell-tree-sitter/blob/master/tree-sitter-java/TreeSitter/Java/AST.hs) and [python](https://github.com/tree-sitter/haskell-tree-sitter/blob/master/tree-sitter-python/TreeSitter/Python/AST.hs) of...

We might be able to just run the new [licensed-ci action](https://github.com/marketplace/actions/licensed-ci), though I'm not 100% sure about how well cabal is supported.

Agree this is confusing! I think I might vote to remove `--fail-on-parse-error` and `--fail-on-warning` altogether in a future version. These switches were added to aid in some integration level testing...

Not quite the same thing, but we are now [publishing docker images](https://github.com/github/semantic/packages/11609). `docker run docker.pkg.github.com/github/semantic/semantic`