Timm Baeder
Timm Baeder
For a discussion on allowing libstdc++ to be used with clang, see https://github.com/mitsuba-renderer/mitsuba3/pull/246
Why are you using `-Xclang` at all here, for `-Wall` or `-Wno-unknown-pragmas`?
IIRC I ran into this a long time ago with arguments starting with `-e`: https://godbolt.org/z/4MWb7h9jq so might be a more general problem.
It's fine that a "no-diagnostics" comment is required, _but_ if I pass `-verify=foo`, I must use "foo-no-diagnostics" and as such, it would be nice if error messages about the usage...
I don't think "expected-no-diagnostics" is to be taken literally; it's just the default when no `-verify=` is passed.
You might wanna look at b4e0589b2cd98a93aad449486bb2a52ab8790781, which did something similar.
I thought the current interpreter has some notion of "steps" it executes and a limit for those; does that limit not trigger when constructors of too large arrays are being...
Sounds incorrect, yes
Does this fail in the test suite anywhere? It's just the one from `records.cpp`, isn't it?