tasy5kg
tasy5kg
@PrototypeZ 我再次测试了一下: 我新建了一个空白工程,依然是 Android Studio 4.0.1。 `build.gradle` 如下: ``` apply plugin: 'com.android.application' android { compileSdkVersion 30 buildToolsVersion "30.0.2" defaultConfig { applicationId "me.tasy5kg.myapplication" minSdkVersion 25 targetSdkVersion 30 versionCode 1 versionName "1.0"...
我的审美不太够😔
@tanersener ,Hello. I have cloned [ffmpeg-kit-test/android](https://github.com/tanersener/ffmpeg-kit-test/tree/main/android) to local and built ```test-app-maven-central``` . The same issue has been reproduced. ~~**Update**: There is no problem with the source code. I didn't download...
~~Maybe I found the reason... When switching ```compileSdkVersion``` from ```32``` to ```30``` it returned the correct result.~~ **Update**: This is still not the right reason. Please check out later posts....
@tanersener , I went ahead and tried a few things and found that the issue is not related to the SDK version. **Seems to be an issue with SAF.** ---...
@tanersener , thank you for your patience in replying. Sorry, I didn't specify it. ```FFprobeKit.getMediaInformation("av1_encoded_video.mkv").mediaInformation``` is _property access syntax_ in Kotlin. It equals ```FFprobeKit.getMediaInformation("av1_encoded_video.mkv").getMediaInformation()``` in Java. Your methods does work....
I apologize for not providing a full screenshot initially. However, I am sure I am not making the wrong comparison. The command lines used in each round of comparison are...
This is hevc (native) -> h264 (libx264). Termux consumes 23.7 seconds and 756M of memory; FFmpeg-Kit consumes 32.2 seconds and 896M of memory. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99d55/99d552ef29950d74448dc241ed1e9186f21de8a0" alt="IMG_20240412_021722" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8eb77/8eb77ff2607ebd8881b2db13020142039c1934ed" alt="Screenshot_2024-04-12-02-14-08-499_me tasy5kg cutesqueeze"
> If you have time, I suggest testing `FFmpegKit` with the following options and checking if the performance improves in any of those scenarios. > > 1. No GUI in...
I noticed that the wiki page [Speed Optimization](https://github.com/arthenica/ffmpeg-kit/wiki/Speed-Optimization) mentioned that the `--speed` option can _increase the speed of FFmpeg operations_ but _not set by default_. Could the reason be related...