tasogare3710

I think that better to put an asterisk like `if*`, `switch*`, `for*`, `while*`. ```js const num = if* (cond) { 100; } else { 10; }; const iterable = for*...

@kasperpeulen > That makes very much sense to me if the * indicates an implicit do* expression. Yes. I believe that it is implicit do expression, but may be confusing...

@babakness I think that noise is generated due to too many functions names and function applications. If do not need reusability, arrow function feels noisy. Btw, may not need to...

@babakness Is * so ugly? I think that it is not much different from =>. I can understand your idea, but explicit do expr is too nested. At least, if...

@babakness Again, I can understand your idea, but I think that idea can say the same for generator expressions as well as asterisked implicit do expressions. You before, said generator...

@babakness In this issue no one has argued that the function is wonderful (About implicit do or do* expressions). Javascript is not functional programming. Function is just a first class...

@ljharb > do { if (true) { function foo() {} } }() would work fine. It is a conditional compilation and the `foo` block level function. In other words, The...

@clemmy that's right. @ljharb If conditional compilation is enabled, the function is added to `VariableEnvironment`. When conditional compilation is disable, a block level functions are added to `LexicalEnvironment`. Then, `do...

Hi, To use unscaled metrics, You can pass Font::units_per_em() to the `px` parameter, but I couldn't find a way to get side bearing. In my opinion, we cannot get the...

>Do you think you will be able to provide a pull request for this? I'm so sorry, but I not know picocli inside out to send a pull request. >A...