Tony Arcieri comments

Results 2551 comments of


                                            Tony Arcieri

support private tags and tag numbers >30 that are stored in long form

@kamulos if you are still interested in this, I would prefer a much more minimal PR which only changes the handling of the `Tag` type, and doesn't try to add...

support private tags and tag numbers >30 that are stored in long form

@kamulos thanks, though now we have three PRs open for this. #1651 is looking pretty good and has working tests

support private tags and tag numbers >30 that are stored in long form

@kamulos can you perhaps open a PR to #1651 to add your test cases?

support private tags and tag numbers >30 that are stored in long form

Ended up going with #1651 instead

dbl: retire crate and vendor implementation into downstream users?

Another way to go might be a `gf128` crate with support for this polynomial which has more operations than just `dbl`. Perhaps it could be useful for implementing MGM, for...

dbl: retire crate and vendor implementation into downstream users?

I'm fine with either closing this out and leaving things as-is with a `dbl` crate, or renaming the crate to something which could potentially be a little more general. I...

dbl: retire crate and vendor implementation into downstream users?

One thing I will say is `dbl` is quite possibly one of the easiest crates to rename/replace, so I think we can continue talking about better options. A couple other...

dbl: retire crate and vendor implementation into downstream users?

Aah, good point, maybe we should fix that first

dbl: retire crate and vendor implementation into downstream users?

So, looking at `pmac` at least, the only place I see `Dbl` in the public API is a blanket impl of `PmacCipher` for `Dbl`. So yes, it's there, but it's...

Awesome Rust Cryptography: Should Double Ratchet algorithms be added to the Transport Encryption Libraries section

I'd think of them more like E2EE messaging libraries. We don't have a section for that but there are many things we could potentially put under there if we did.