Tamas Gal

That's very fast: ``` >>> %time dir(f.events.tracks) CPU times: user 3.29 ms, sys: 32 µs, total: 3.32 ms Wall time: 3.37 ms ['E', 'dir_x', 'dir_y', 'dir_z', 'fitinf', 'id', 'len', 'lik',...

Maybe I forgot to mention but the main problem is also that hitting TAB takes the same time always. If it was just a 30sec hang for the very first...

Here, I have a very small sample file and call all the attributes from `dir(f.events.tracks)` explicitly. As you can see, the first call takes ~250ms (it does some caching there)...

Yes, it's quite huge... [jedi.log.zip](https://github.com/davidhalter/jedi/files/6441518/jedi.log.zip)

Yes, sure! (btw. the code is runnable also for you since the test file comes packaged if you do `pip install km3io km3net_testdata`) Here it is, looks fast enough for...

It would be really cool to support Jupyter-like single-letter keybindings (inspired by Vim), like `o` for new cell below, `O` for new cell above. For this however, it needs a...

So what's the statement about the support for modality? Are now PRs allowed? @fonsp 🙂

I fully agree with customisations and I think this also holds for modal editing, which of course cannot be solved by just allowing full customisation but requires a mode toggle...

b), c) and d) would require "modal editing" which is not accepted even if it's from a PR, at least this is the last comment about it (from a year...

Haha thanks ;)