Martin Roelfs

Why is it harder for functions that only return a number? We can already do that now, right? Like, ```python {y: lambda x: x} ``` is valid input to `CallableNumericalModel`....

Ah, I see what you mean. No, I'm not intending to always use the `Ans` object, that would indeed be worse. I'm just proposing that if a component is evaluated,...

With regards to visualizing higher dimensional data, perhaps we should look into t-SNE. It seems this is popular in machine learning for visualizing higher dimensional data so it could be...

@lesshaste, that also looks very interesting, thanks for the suggestion! I do think one of these techniques could solve the problem for doing higher dimensional interactive guesses, by playing a...

I feel this might be related to why tbuli/symfit#104 fails, since `scipy` and `symfit` are not resolved at all apparently, and `sympy` refers to the wrong thing. I don't think...

Hi @kevinxxq, thanks for your question! I'm not sure I understand your problem tough. The symfit model dict can have any number of elements in it, e.g. ```python x_1, x_2,...

Interested by problem, can you provide the full traceback so I can see which lines cause problems? Also, is your jim_model a symbolic expression or another Model instance?

Interesting issue, can you also share how you defined all your parameters and variables? I'm very surprised that it says you have more than 255 since your function definition is...

Sorry for the long silence, I was to shocked to respond. That's a very serious issue, thanks for reporting it! As a short term solution, you can probably use GradientModel...

A dictionary might be a solution, but ultimately I think the solution is the introduction of indexed variables into symfit. With that you could instead write: ```python model_dict={y[i]: jim_model_sym(x[i],norm1[i],nthr1[i],holes_k1[i],holes_tau1[i],interface_k1[i],interface_tau) }...