Martin Roelfs

I personally don't see that as a problem, because explicit is better than implicit. The problem with allowing data for interdependent variables would be that in your last example, ```python...

Hi guys, thanks for keeping up the good work, I've been a bit swamped with work regarding the last stages of my PhD so I've struggled to find time to...

I cannot comment on the specific problem here without the full traceback, but symbolical summation is not yet supported. In the tests I made a quick hack because I know...

Have a look at the code for `LogLikelihood` in `symfit.core.objectives` for inspiration. Probably you should build something very similar which takes a two component model for `p` and `q` in...

Thanks, I'm curious about seeing this in action. I now see what you mean, but I think you are using the wrong terminology in that case, because you want to...

Thanks for sharing, I might incorporate it in the future if we have a good toy model, perhaps you can point me in the direction of a simple example which...

Thanks for reporting back :). If you want, you could do the following: make an assert that the current syntax raises a deprecation warning, since they are raised for a...

@DuckNrOne, I think this might be an interesting first step in your quest to increase coverage since this will simply knock out an ill-tested component without adding any new code....

Sorry, could you elaborate on that? I'm afraid I don't understand your comment. What are A and B?

Interesting, that does sound like something was changed upstream. Perhaps we could also consider changing it to something like: ```python if variance is not None: return np.sqrt(variance) else: return None...