Tomáš Mráz

Results 1511 comments of Tomáš Mráz

> Sigh, also here, backporting will require separate PRs due to merge conflicts. This is not just a doc fix. This kind of code changes aren't usually backported.

We cannot change the semantics of d2i and I am not sure adding new variants of d2i with different semantics makes much sense.

Could you please add a testcase?

Merged to all the active branches. Thank you for your contribution.

**OTC: Is this a bug fix -> should it be backported to all stable branches?**

**OTC: This is a bug and eligible for backport to stable branches.**

> @t8m is it acceptable to approve this to be run on the CI? Yes, sure, the approval is there just to check there won't be any malicious code run...

ping @omerkattan-microsoft could you please rebase this and address my comments above?

Could you please try the openssl-3.0-beta2 release to check if the problem is still there?

> Eg. `!` for key_share (client) and `*` for "worth a HRR" (server). The same group would then look like: > `*!X25519MLKEM678:*SecP256r1MLKEM768:!X25519:P-256 IMO instead of _worth a HRR_ marker you...