Tomáš Mráz
Tomáš Mráz
Could you please do what @paulidale suggested in the tests? And please rebase to resolve the conflict.
CI is relevant
This is unfortunately not acceptable with CLA: trivial. Could you please submit a regular CLA?
@JohnnySavages Have you been able to submit a CLA? https://openssl-library.org/policies/cla/index.html
Please submit a CLA according to https://openssl-library.org/policies/cla/index.html Alternatively, this would be acceptable with CLA: trivial I think.
It would be nice to have a testcase. Do you think you would be able to write one?
> Note that I've added a minimalistic test case only to demonstrate what the PR fixes. The test doesn't cover a more complex case of running QUIC with custom extensions...
I am not sure we want this. It would certainly require broader discussion.
> Why does it need a rebase? It's current with the feature branch. I'm happy to rebase it to master to simplify merging. Please look at the commits in this...
OK with CLA: trivial