Robert Szulist
Robert Szulist
Can you provide a code sample for this?
> Do we agree to follow [conventional commits spec](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/) ? Should we follow semantic versioning ? Maybe that's obvious, but we should be sure we all use the same versioning...
So, it's been a while since this started. Requests for zabbix sender are still ever present, so it would be nice to at least inform the users of concrete future...
So after reading all the comments, this i my current take: # pyzabbix and zappix Leave zappix and pyzabbix as seperate packages, as their domains do not overlap. People migrating...
Just a thought: For some time now I'm developing and maintaining a package that implements most aspects of Zabbix protocol (sender included) over at: https://gitlab.com/szuro/zappix It is pretty feature-rich: it...
> Do you have write permission on this repository ? If not maybe @lukecyca could give it to you so you still have a hand on your project. I do...
Given that we want to combine 3 projects into a single one, I'm worried that the namespace will be bloated. The most straightforward solution would go something like this: ```...
Please take a look at the discussion taking place here: #197 In the meantime, you can use `zappix` to satisfy all of your Zabbix-protocol related needs.
I'm experiencing a similar issue. In my case I'm tailing a fast-changing file with up to 4 milions of entries. However it seems to me that this is more related...
After running with `CompleteLines=true` for >24h, I see no issues with incomplete lines.