Sylvain Leclerc

Maybe `TypedValue.untyped(value)` to be more explicit ?

@geofjamg @phiedw @annetill : any opinion about that topic ?

Indeed, more information could be very interesting: for example, in other tools, we also get some information about the generators that reached their limit. We could also add some information...

Some functional/design questions to be discussed: 1. Do we consider those new results as a new "category" of results which we could name "regulation results" ? I think it would...

About criterion-based lists, I wonder about the possibility of having a more re-usable approach: defining a set of elements or filters of elements is something that could be used for...

Note that it will be interesting also for the consequences of actions. In internal project, we not only display a global amount, but a more detailed list of loads and...

I agree it would be better to have the ID of the bus available. The reason behind using voltage level ID, like in voltage violations, was that calculated buses are...

I have a doubt about implementing this: the tradeoff is between ease of use and safety/understandability. On the one hand, today you must filter your columns, if you have too...

You're right: just checking terminals are not null will avoid the null pointer but will not identify correctly couplers, in the general case. Most often, a coupler is connected to...

(I meant kin**d** there was a typo :) ) I meant that typically, a load (but any other element like a line, a generator ...) will be connected to a...