Daniel Lee

I think this is going to interact really poorly with the standalone generated quantities. (My guess is that it'll cause segfaults... I've already seen it happen as-is.) Before deciding to...

@bob-carpenter, sorry! I just saw that I was tagged with this in the original post! I missed that notification. (I wonder what else I missed.)

> I think standalone GQ would just error that a parameter is missing. No. Currently, this will cause segfaults in a lot of conditions! ccing: @rok-cesnovar and @jgabry

Thanks for tagging this as v3.0.0. I don't think we can change existing behavior because it'll be a off-by-one nightmare everywhere, but if we do split to multiple files, this...

That would be great! I couldn't follow everything you said, but if you have an idea of an implementation, that's better than what I've got. On Wed, Aug 12, 2015...

Thanks for the request. Can you be more specific? Things that I don't understand: - why should anything that starts with `raw` be excluded by default? (what's special about that...

> Nothing special about the prefix 'raw'. Just pick some prefix. Got it. Thanks for the clarification. > Why isn't it a good idea? Thanks for the example. That helps...

Thank you. That helps quite a bit. Just to get more specific, what does that 60M impact? Are you trying to conserve disk space? Network bandwidth? Or just simplicity in...

> @syclik could this be related to the other issues we were seeing before? #668 Yes, it's possible. I've never run this with clang++ on a Windows box. I'm not...

Just reporting back... I haven't been able to log in yet; technical difficulties. We'll try again later.