Michał Jaworski

I really don't know. I'm not convinced to code generators of that type so probably won't dedicate any time for this. But if someone has energy and time to do...

It looks that option 1. is as simple as: ``` diff index 25728e3..6368521 100644 --- a/src/graceful/serializers.py +++ b/src/graceful/serializers.py @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ class MetaSerializer(type): ) -class BaseSerializer(metaclass=MetaSerializer): +class BaseSerializer(BaseField, metaclass=MetaSerializer):...

Seems like with the new validation in `1.0.0` version it will be even simpler and more clear. Other problem that have surfaced is how to present validation issues in nested...

@holic-cl, there is little hiatus in this projects. As far as I remember, the proposed change was never included and released. It's mostly because I had no idea how to...

also watch on falconry/falcon#145 issue so this may be solved within falcon framework

I have removed this from any milestone because if we get basic support for this in falcon upstream. If so we will have to either fix falcon requirements on latest...

This goes to 1.0.0 because requires backwards incompatible changes.

I have removed the milestone as it is only an idea that needs to be discussed.

Did you take another look at this pull request?

Yes, there is still issue with 'is_measuring' problem. I didn't know how to achieve this in elegant way. This is because celery backend doesn't need such workaround to ensure that...