Steve Winslow

+1 to HPND-export2-us, thanks @jlovejoy! # License Inclusion Decision ## Decision: - [X] approved - [ ] not approved ## Name HPND with US Government export control and 2 disclaimers...

+1 to @jlovejoy's comments above. As mentioned, it looks to me that the changes between the license text at https://www.w3.org/copyright/software-license-2023/, as compared to [`W3C-20150513`](https://spdx.org/licenses/W3C-20150513.html), would be considered equivalent for SPDX...

@jlovejoy Given that the "NCL Source Code License" at https://www.ncl.ucar.edu/Download/NCL_source_license.shtml doesn't match exactly (e.g. doesn't have "of the Software" as you mentioned), I'm not sure we want to reference that...

Discussed on 2024-03-28 Legal team call, agreed to add, ID as `NCL` and name as "NCL Source Code License". Should include markup to handle FFTPACK changes per @Pizza-Ria's comment immediately...

@jlovejoy I'm taking a look at why this test is failing...

For some reason it looks like the suffix "-exception" was added to the ends of the filenames, for both the XML and the test text?

I'll submit some edits to see if I can fix it.

``` The following warning(s) were identified: Duplicates licenses: HPND-sell-variant-MIT-disclaimer-rev, HPND-sell-variant ```

Not sure either, since [HPND-sell-variant](https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/blob/main/src/HPND-sell-variant.xml) doesn't seem like it should match this one. I suspect there's something going on with the regex's which might be capturing this incorrectly. I'd suggest...

@xsuchy @jlovejoy I've pushed 166129d which looks incredibly ugly, but is just adding new "Duplicates licenses" warnings at the end of the wall-of-text list. (At some point we should probably...