Steve Winslow

As mentioned in #2459, now that the naming issue is resolved for the -ALv2 variant, I am marking this as approved pending creation of the XML / test text files.

PR #2698 submitted to add this

Looking at this one through the lens of the "Other factors" in the SPDX [License Inclusion Principles](https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/blob/main/DOCS/license-inclusion-principles.md): * I don't think this is likely to be considered as satisfying the...

[CAL-1.0](https://spdx.org/licenses/CAL-1.0.html) was added to the SPDX License List because it was approved by OSI. Under the [license inclusion principles](https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/blob/main/DOCS/license-inclusion-principles.md), any OSI-approved license gets added to the SPDX list. That's as...

This has been discussed on (at least) two prior SPDX legal team calls, with the view being that DCL-1.0 does not meet the License Inclusion Principles at this time. Apologies...

Thanks @vargenau for noting this. I would be inclined to delete the following sentence from https://github.com/spdx/spdx-3-model/blob/main/model/ExpandedLicensing/Properties/standardLicenseTemplate.md: > See the Legacy Text Template format section of the SPDX specification for format...

With [the v3.24.0 release of the License List](https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-legal/message/3558), we've now switched to SemVer.

@JPEWdev @zvr Any further changes needed here from your perspective? Based on https://github.com/spdx/spdx-3-model/blob/main/model/SimpleLicensing/Properties/licenseListVersion.md and https://github.com/spdx/spdx-3-model/blob/main/model/SimpleLicensing/Classes/LicenseExpression.md I think the spec documents the License List version as SemVer. So together with the...

Hello, It doesn't look like there is a way to comment inline in the PDF itself, so I'm replying with a couple of thoughts here. For slide 6 "Terms of...

cc @jlovejoy for visibility This was extensively discussed in 2020-2021 as part of the original discussions for the licensing profile for 3.0. In my view, the current structure is not...