sw96411

Results 6 comments of sw96411

Thanks @GCHQDev404. For clarity, I think instead of "Shared Caches" I should probably have said something like "CacheLoaders with a common persistent store". This is required whenever you have multiple...

Just leaving a quick note based on our offline conversations to say that following an e2e test, this code in itself looks good, but performance issues arise, at least partly...

Just a quick note to say that the code looks good and I've had a quick test against my team's dev environment. Although I wasn't able to do a full...

P.S. Thanks v much @GCHQDev404 for the excellent work on this issue :-)

@n3101 When I raised this ticket, I was really trying to have a discussion with the community about a way of allowing named ops to reference each other in a...

In theory (ie. see gh-2457) the existing Gaffer Cache can be backed by a database, either via configuring and plugging the JCS cache implementation already used by gaffer (e.g. via...