Chris Lilley

> I believe this was an oversight, we forgot to update it. Indeed, the [previous CSS WG discussion where we changed the name](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1092#issuecomment-322828654) did not consider the impact on the...

We didn't get to this on today's call, can we resolve here in the issue? @jfkthame suggested three things: 1. was the renaming to `font-variant-emoji` a correct decision 2. if...

Hearing no objections, I plan to make the edits as @jfkthame suggested.

For any element where `opacity` is non-unity, that element and all it's children are rendered to an initially transparent black RGBA buffer (including the effect of any alpha components in...

[Draft charter for review by CSS WG](https://w3c.github.io/charter-drafts/2022/css-2022.html) Changes are: - Text that came from the charter template updated to use any newer text from [current template](https://w3c.github.io/charter-drafts/charter-template.html) - Link to new...

Fixed, except for: - patent policy, because "W3C seeks to issue Web Specifications" is correct (and CSS is one such) - CSS 2.1 Specification, because that was indeed the whole...

So, which specifications are likely to make it to Rec in the next year? I'm thinking CSS Variables 1 and Media Queries 4 are strong candidates

> Is §13.2 normative? There have been discussions about the use of the phrasing “This CSS gamut mapping algorithm” versus “The CSS gamut mapping algorithm”, and the non-normative marker on...

> In order to guarantee color matching between CSS and images, it is necessary that the same processing be applied to pixels coming from CSS and pixels coming from images....

> “colors won't look good on some devices” essentially means “on every non-Apple device in existence” for at least the next couple of years… Yes but to clarify: there are...