Chris Lilley

Re-opening since we dropped the ball on **Relative Color Syntax.** Jen [asked about RCS](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7310#issue-1248354399) in the initial post in this issue; there was a [brief discussion on May 25](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7310#issuecomment-1137562376) but...

@jensimmons [said](https://github.com/web-platform-tests/interop-2022/issues/104#issuecomment-1214180671) > Relative color syntax was not on that list because it was deemed not ready. The recommendation was that browsers should not ship relative color syntax. There wasn't...

@tabatkins @fantasai @atanassov

@LeaVerou @fantasai we resolved to add `stripes()` ages ago and the edit was not made, this PR looks like a good way forward?

IIRC in the past we argued that `bolder` and `lighter` are blunt instruments and that if content authors really care what they get, they should specify (or calculate) explicit weights.

>> Is there any reason why we can't go for CSSStyleProperties/CSS2Properties then CSSPageDescriptors, CSSCounterStyleDescriptors, etc? > I guess not really, that'd be fine for me. I'm not following what specific...

The `opacity` property operates independent of alpha, and apples to an entire subtree. The effect is as if the whole subtree is rendered to an offscreen buffer, including any alpha...

I believe this was an oversight, we forgot to update it. I think renaming `auto` to `normal` as you suggest makes sense, but would like to hear from others.

I agree with @jfkthame that from an authoring point of view it is consistent with the other font-variant properties and thus, the renaming that happened was correct. I therefore think...

> used to be named something like emoji-presentation (but got renamed to its current name). > I don’t know why it got renamed to its current name. It used to...