SJ
I've made suggestions in the slack chat, but essentially, I'm curious if we can kick any of that to `pants.ci.toml`, opt-in disable it, or just remove it entirely.
> The solution for https://github.com/pantsbuild/pants/issues/16445 would probably be a big part of fixing this. I agree, or in general, some way to fully lazy-load backends - so unless your selected...
I'd be a huge fan of treating pants like a pants repo. And I think Stu's suggestion of having a "binary engine mode" against a "source engine mode" would make...
Deprecation of stuff in the Apple ecosystem is such a pain in general. Mostly because I do a lot of iOS development and Apple doesn't like to backport new functionality....
That's weird, as it sounds like Pants isn't picking up a bootstrap/global option changing. TO confirm, this was all at the command-line right? You're not setting that value inside of...
No problem, the bug itself is a concern, but not sure if we should keep it open or close. If this ever happened to me, it's one of those things...
To be clear, this isn't a big deal - as the workaround is probably to just manually delete the lock file - just weird.
Ah, I missed that. It's pretty close - would you consider it a dupe? Or just dupe-adjacent?
TIL we didn't run tests on ARM in CI. My brain just sees aarch64 and assumes Mac apparently... Damn you Apple! 😆 Some small part of me wants to run...
I particularly like this idea as it would mean non-breaking changes when features become stable - which is one gripe I have with the current system. As in, a CLI...