sujato
sujato
Okay, but it's important to keep up to date, so we should find out the reason for the discrepancy.
Hey thanks! I look at it and go, "crikey, I've been fiddling with this for years and it still doesn't work properly! What an amateur!" Anyway, we'll see if this...
> > the suttaplex for bi-pd2-8 should reference texts not parallels (remove "parallels in ancient texts") > > Bhante @sujato , Besides `bi-pd2-8`, are there any other similar cases? All...
> > add suttaplexes for individual rules, bi-pd2, bi-pd3, etc. Each one of these has parallels but no text. > >  Looks good, except - they need...
Ok, getting there. I just noticed that in your screenshot, the bare "parallels" suttaplexes are using the old long form of the acronym: Pli Tv Bi Vb Pd 7, whereas...
Good idea, thanks.
Most definitely so. You know how it is, there are always so many things, it's easy to overlook stuff. We're very happy for helpful suggestions!
Well thanks. You're most welcome to check through our issues, although best check with us before proceeding, because they might be stale.
Thanks for the help, I didn't realize this. What i have found is that using the precomposed glyph ṁ it "just works" in HTML, so presumably the browser is clever...
This is an essential feature for us, we'd love to use flexsearch but without fuzzy search we'll have to use something else.