Tiago Carvalho
Tiago Carvalho
hm, we would only give priority to some protocol txs, not all. with the current code, I think they can only take up to half of the available block space...
> For the first point, can't we check this when trying to admit a tx to the mempool? yeah I think so
cc @cwgoes @tzemanovic should we implement this for phase 1?
@cwgoes these keys, which also live in `wallet.toml` https://github.com/anoma/namada/blob/f5c3b708018c38bb8768da57ce3199a208ff9e12/crates/sdk/src/wallet/store.rs#L38-L45
yeah, they're currently only required by the eth bridge code, which is deactivated anyway
that answer depends on the premise that the eth bridge is never gonna be enabled. 🤷 we could always add these keys back to the wallet, but idk. @cwgoes
@cwgoes kind of, but it won't be that useful for mainnet. tokens that have ridiculously large denominations won't be able to be stored in a `u64`. on namada mainnet, the...
@brentstone fyi your merge didn't include the last commit. you can probably add the last commit as a `fixup!` of the merge commit ig
@cwgoes this issue refers to the namada-local event log, which currently is not even persisted to disk, if a node is killed. this is mostly used to serve rpc queries,...
Depends on #3103