Stijn de Gooijer
Stijn de Gooijer
Let's go with `breaks`. @orlp could you set up a PR for this?
I think this is a good option to have. I don't like `is_close` as a name though 🤔
I personally like `almost_equal`. We can bikeshed the exact name if someone opens a PR for this.
Yes, I definitely want this to work. I want to expressify `step` / `interval` for the range functions when I get to it.
I've felt a bit apprehensive pressing the merge button, because I'm not sure these methods are really that useful. Don't we already offer the right tools to do this yourself?...
Thanks - I'll double check this on my Windows PC. Perhaps it can be structured a bit differently not to need these ignores in the first place.
@alexander-beedie I just got a spurious failure in the CI, I think it might be related to the async test added in this PR as it looks async-ish. What do...
This is similar to the discussion in https://github.com/pola-rs/polars/issues/11913 I'm not sure there needs to be a parameter for this, but if there is one, I wouldn't want to call it...
I really don't want to merge this with the current parameter name. It's extremely unclear to me. What are you matching? Any of what? What would it mean to set...