Samuel Thibault
Samuel Thibault
> I've already asked about exact procedure That's exactly why it's *way* simpler to make *maintainers* reproduce the issue. Explaining the exact procedure would be a very tedious thing for...
> I don't need any explanation. By "explaining" I meant specifying the exact command etc. > Do you know that command? I don't know the command, but it's basically written...
But which version of espeak-ng is that, exactly?
As already mentioned before, please test master, or at the very least apply 199cbe4 and 3ce135a on top of 1.51.1
Avoid using parallel builds with -j, so we can be able to actually check the difference between results. You can use -k to get the whole testsuite results. It *seems*...
Was that master? It looks like 1.51.1
As `make check` shows, please add a phoneme test
As the checks report, please update the japanese test result as well.
`100% tests passed, 0 tests failed out of 93` on ppcel indeed
I don't have access to an alpha machine