Steve Day

@timgdavies - thanks for the clarification, I'd forgotten that part of the discussion. However, I think for the purposes of this experiment we should start with the simple case where...

We decided in our mid-sprint review call to park any future work on this feature, except for one small technical foundation which I've ticketed as #10. We'll review later whether...

See https://github.com/openownership/visualisation-tool/pull/17#discussion_r428642755

This isn't needed by alaveteli any more, so I'll leave it open to merge if you'd like it, but it's not essential. I also couldn't make it work in alaveteli's...

I'm removing this from the scope of the current sprint, as discussed in our mid-sprint review call. We don't think it's too difficult to do (as a popup/overlay), but it's...

I took a quick look at this today, there's a simple switch in terms of [the underlying options we give to dagre-d3](https://github.com/openownership/visualisation-tool/blob/c760e4bfc602f93bcf9900ea1b8b51102aa3fcd3/src/index.js#L14), but doing so breaks the offset paths we...

Thanks @jpmckinney - I took a little look at fixing this today and it seems it's the result of a longstanding bug with `foreignobject`: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23113 which we use to render...

See https://github.com/openownership/visualisation-tool/pull/17#discussion_r425676892 for an example of something that could be potentially cleaned up whilst refactoring.

Thanks for flagging this inconsistency @timgdavies - I think it's an interesting topic to revisit. My thoughts so far: > This implies that if multiple indirect relationships existed a single...

> I'd be interested in @stevenday's thoughts on what he is seeing with publishing patterns from existing registers. Is the UK model of publishing extremely minimal company info in a...