Steve Fan

By merging the user layer with the base layer using fuse-overlayfs, you can successfully save the user-initiated changes such as plugin and theme install. The only problem: it requires FUSE...

> I fail to see which benefit fuse-overlayfs brings. Is this only about permissions? Also moving the whole ci to postgres should not be the scope of this PR. It...

@Brutus5000 your plugins will not be saved in the next run

@Brutus5000 interesting, so you also mounted other folders such as build and public as well?

@Brutus5000 if you said so I'd remove the FUSE requirement then on. I was worried if some extra files are not persisted during the process. If we can pinpoint where...

Oh I remember why I needed overlayfs, because I was using it with Kubernetes and there is no way of storing individual files which the config unfortunately lives in the...

@julianlam Wonder if you have anything to add? This patch will greatly help containerized NodeBB use such as in Kubernetes and Docker

> @nilsramsperger Can you kindly do a test run and let us know if there are any unexpected behaviours with this new image? Oh also expect longer build times for...

> I'd say at the very least ppc64le (I wonder how many PowerPC devices run NodeBB...) and arm v6 should go. I'd even be in favor of dropping v7. The...

> It still seems the permissions for the default config directory are broken, I'm still getting > > ```shell > nodebb-nodebb-1 | chmod: /opt/config: Operation not permitted > nodebb-nodebb-1 |...