Stephen Kell

I have compiled with the following small patch. Am now running this version! ``` diff --git a/extsmaild.c b/extsmaild.c index 50b2b13..4bd801c 100644 --- a/extsmaild.c +++ b/extsmaild.c @@ -1621,8 +1621,8 @@ int...

Yep, happy -- thanks!

This was fixed in 0ed8eafd.

I wonder if trapping `set_thread_area()` is a sane way to do this (on Linux, on x86...). It is less hairy than trapping `clone()`.

I believe this is now fixed.

Another thing to mention: the mess with aliases (see comments in allocs-cflags). Neither `GRP_COMDAT` section groups nor global-symbol uniquing do the right thing in the presence of aliases; they can...

Another thing was my aborted attempt at using strongly connected components (SCCs) in the DWARF to generate a stable notion of type identity for recursive types that may be defined...

Continuing the 'opaque struct' thing: one could perhaps relate it to the idea in C that "types have no linkage" and the definition of "compatible type". I think the short...

Continuing again: we are only forced to create one if we let synthetic file/line information creep into the summary codes of the struct or any of its (transitive) constituents. But...

Another topic is the fun with gdb had during chain loading... e.g. how gdb will scan the `.dynamic` section in the file on disk, and only access inferior memory in...