stefan hakansson

Just noting that I agree to @xingri - would be good to discuss and agree on gaming related requirements. I could not join yesterday (and also suspected it would not...

This LGTM now. My only comment would be that N49 could perhaps be less specific - saying something about that the (receiving) application must be able to control the feedback...

@alvestrand would something along ``` The application must be able to control how quickly a media receiving user agent must inform the media sender about network throughput changes (degradations? losses?)...

It says `This helps the application recover faster from lossy network conditions.`. I think it would be more correct to state something like `This helps the video rendering to recover...

@aboba thanks for describing the complexities involved. I a bit slow to rev up, but I can't find the section in RFC7742 that says "WebRTC implementations SHOULD support RPSI" -...

@aboba thanks a lot for the elaboration. To some extent I agree to that implementations should support the generic case. But looking at it from another angle: there is one...

The way I see it is: a) We have an agreed sub-use case "Game streaming" in the "Low latency streaming" use case of the document "WebRTC Extended Use Cases" b)...

The current formulation works for me. I would change "application" for "user-agent", but that is just a detail.

@guidou you're assigned to this Issue, will you have time to look into it (soon)?

Getting desperate, is this something you could take a look at @yellowdoge?