stefan hakansson

@rshpount to me it seems better to have several options for the sender - the encoding is more complex, so if one of the codecs that are acceptable for the...

Is this related?: I'm looking at a case where the offerer offers sendonly video. I struggle on how to enable the receiving application to apply codec preferences (re-order and prune)....

Thanks @Orphis. I guess that is what I want to do, but I struggle on _how_ to apply those preferences. Edit, it should be between the `setRemoteDescription` (not `Local`) with...

@fippo thanks for a good summary! For my case (unidirectional medai), things now make sense as the receiving (also being SDP answerer) end can use transceiver.setCodecPreferences to indicate preferred receive...

I agree to your conclusion @alvestrand and like the proposed note. Likely there should be some reference to an SDP RFC as well, but that's just a detail.

Thanks @anssiko.

However, the only change would be adding something like `[Exposed=(Window, Worker)]` , right? Feels like a small thing to add to v1 (and even if worker exposure is not part...

I understand (I was just trying to push a bit :-) perhaps I should push on implementers instead).

Sounds good! As for user consent: the path we've lately taken for gUM is to use the Permission API. This could be an opportunity (the page could ask for persisted...

Thanks for pointing this out and for providing the pointers.