Stephen Chang
Stephen Chang
Open to suggestions, but otherwise we'll just follow Racket's major-minor-patch versioning system.
Oh I didn't mean to match Racket's exact version. Just to use Racket's version numbering conventions.
Anything in the `interop` library (with a `$` prefix) is equivalent to directly writing plain js. It shouldnt know anything about Racket. So if something like this were to be...
`$/require` should correspond to nodejs `require` function, so it should be possible to write that js code snippet directly using the ffi. But is the issue that the files in...
I would support adding something like `$/require/rkt`, but could you fill in some more use case details? I still have a disconnect between the js use case and what the...
Ok that's pretty straightforward then
I tried to add the requested `$/require/rkt`, see https://github.com/racketscript/racketscript/pull/286 But I think I'm running into the problem I alluded to above, which is that the required library doesn't have the...
Yes, call/cc is currently unsupported. It's definitely not Racket and we need to be clear about this.
Nice. Is it worth it to keep adding tests? Or should I wait until the kernel is ported?