stap-m

@stage1407 Please add here the next steps we decided on in our meeting yesterday. Please also record your work on the issue here by commenting. Thanks!

Domain and range of `uses` are both continuants. That fits well already. _A relation that holds between a continuant c1 and a continuant c2, where c1 requires c2 as input...

I opened PR #909 to implement the policy instrument subclasses. Releations to related economic values are still missing and need to be included by the time the respective terms /...

What a productive issue, nice :) I'm in favour of adding `environmental system process` and `environmental system`. Our `emission` process is now mising in the proposal by @sfluegel05 . I...

Can this be implemented (partly) before the next release?

> I think it is a good idea to mention in the [PR-Guideline](https://github.com/OpenEnergyPlatform/ontology/wiki/Pull-request-workflow) to wait for a second review if the PR is too large (maybe set a rule for...

This refers to energy system models, if it is planned to make the source code publicly available in future. @jannahastings do you have an idea how to depict that in...

The next release is planned for Oct 1st, which would be a great time for introducing such a tool... 😉 Is it complex? @adelmemariani @MGlauer @jannahastings

from oeo-devmeeting 25: * automated annotation seems complex, might cause errors * developers need to check module manually before implementing! * MG proposed proposal hidden annotation option --> git commit...

Not fully finished for release v1.9. Since it is an important issue for our workflow, maybe release this in a minor version before v1.10 (May 1st).