stap-m
stap-m
we have `origin renewable` only for `energies`. We could add a similar / equivalent `origin sustainable` for `portion of matter`?! Would it make sense to add "attributes" like "sustainable" to...
For me, the questions are more complex: - What is the difference between a taxonomy and an ontology from a computer science (or other) perspective? - What is the difference...
@MGlauer are there any updates on this issue?
> This [ `social cost of carbon emission` ] should be `'economic value of' some 'greenhouse gas emission value'` _Originally posted by @l-emele in https://github.com/OpenEnergyPlatform/ontology/pull/1034#discussion_r811840200_
> Things that you measure are neither energies nor processes but quantity values of some energies or processes, so these would be all in `continuant` -> `generically dependent continuant` ->...
> Additionally we should add the axiom 'pumped water' 'has disposition' some 'secondary energy carrier disposition'. I directly implemented this in #1243
@MGlauer this PR is approved but still in draft mode. Can it be merged or are you still working on ist?
Relations like `consumes / emits` should rather relate to a continuant than a process. An axiom like `industry sector emits some greenhouse gas` makes sense. For the relation to the...
What's the state of this issue? Shall we move it to the next Milestone?
related to #482. Maybe it should be discussed/solved together.