Fabrice Drouin
Fabrice Drouin
Yes unfortunately it is correct, see https://github.com/ACINQ/secp256k1-kmp/issues/54 for additional info.
Thanks! Is there a significant impact on runtime performance ? (though it probably does not matter that much since macos M1 would only be used as a development platform, not...
Intel JVM performance on M1 processors is really impressive! Would the `postgres` tests work on an M1 machine or would whey have to use docker even if we provided JNI...
For most LN nodes watch-only wallets are probably enough: you would import all your channel outpoints, and check your wallet transactions for spending transactions (bitcoin core should include them). AFAIK...
update: unless I've missed something, unless you have just a few transactions to monitor, using watch-only wallet would not work as is and even if it was modified it would...
> The "new bitcoin node" would still need to have the `txospenderindex` constructed though right? Which also takes some time no? Yes, you would need to run your bitcoin nodes...
Interesting! We also implemented a simplistic BIP32-based derivation scheme for channel and node keys (with arbitrarily chosen paths).
As discussed, I'm adding more details about why this imho is an issue, and how to fix it: Routing info is made of node announcements, channel announcements, and channel updates....
It seems that there is a 22.1 milestone (see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/milestone/55) but I could not find a release date
What is the rationale for adding this to eclair's API ? Users could simply call bitcoin core's API instead ?