Santiago Saavedra

You should not link to that directly or this project would need to switch to GPLv3. However, you could expose an API at this project level that could be implemented...

Are bounties still interesting here? On bountysource, microG project says that other methods should be considered instead. I'd be OK if @mar-v-in takes this, but if this is not an...

Nice to see a milestone added to this. Thanks for prioritizing it somewhat, @mar-v-in. Glad to be a sponsor as well.

Without more information on the issue, what you tried, what you haven't, what do the logs say... it's difficult for anyone on the internet to help you.

I did not generate those. [Travis does](https://github.com/displaylink-rpm/displaylink-rpm/blob/master/.travis.yml). [Last CentOS job here](https://travis-ci.org/displaylink-rpm/displaylink-rpm/jobs/173889503) I really have no clue on why does CentOS not work. @hadess maybe the libstdc++ compatibility is automatically picked...

What do you mean, into the package? I don't have the sources from DisplayLink, I can do nothing about the binary itself. Should we bundle an older stdlibc++ or what...

To be clear, does this mean that displaylink needs a newer libstdc++ than it is currently provided in centos repos? What should be the desirable approach? Bundle the newer stdlib?

Do we need to fix the LD_LIBRARY_PATH for that binary (without affecting the rest of the system), or does it get picked up automatically by being in the same folder?...

>> Also, how do we avoid rpmlint from introducing the bundled dependency? > > I don't understand this. rpmlint "verifies" packages, it doesn't add dependencies. rpmbuild would have add both...

But then wouldn't that be a problem if CentOS decided to upgrade their own libstdc++, or if another package like this also did the same trick (we'd have two packages...