Sreeraj

Well, then the question is: can we patch https://github.com/Freetz-NG/freetz-ng/blob/master/make/dropbear/patches/100-root-login-only.patch here ? @mkj ?

@PaulSchweizer if it's not too difficult would you try to implement the appendix number change in this PR ? @art1415926535 Would you be able to review the PR when you...

> > > The appendix number is now in place, please give it a try @JBrVJxsc and @sreerajkksd and let me know if it resolves your issues I have tested...

@art1415926535 would you be able to approve this PR if this looks sane to you ?

@art1415926535 I think the final word should come from you.. Would you check this whenever you get some time ?

Can a maintainer take a look and merge this ?

Did we solve this in https://github.com/graphql-python/graphene-sqlalchemy/pull/253 and https://github.com/graphql-python/graphene-sqlalchemy/pull/254 ?

I tested the batching option and it works flawlessly. I have one more related question: From the given example, If `user` field is meant to return multiple users, then it...

There are some discussions about the mutation support in https://github.com/graphql-python/graphene-sqlalchemy/issues/29 and https://gist.github.com/qubitron/6e7d48667a05120dc58bdfd0516b3980 seems to have helped some users.

@jnak that might not work. > ``` > class ShipMutation(relay.ClientIDMutation): > class Input: > ship = graphene.Field(Ship) > ship = graphene.Field(Ship) > ``` `ShipMutationInput.ship` field should be of `Input` type....