spring4175

After thinking about it more I've had a change of heart. An opt-in client builder configuration to take the performance penalty in exchange for saving yourself work and to modify...

Just a note that whoever picks this up (I have no plans on working on it) will have a little bit of work ahead of them due to the fact...

Assigning to self.

#1348 will close this, you can give it a try with your test case if you want (it worked for me): ```toml [dependencies] twilight-http = { branch = "fix-http-ratelimiting-started-at", git...

> Could `unreachable_pub` to the deny list? (See my comment in https://github.com/twilight-rs/twilight/discussions/1644.) As-is this doesn't catch any accidental private types. This creates a *lot* of false positives and would require...

> I think we should probably have a nice way to handle clusters before merging it since there is no reason for everyone to invent their own here. Although a...

> > Is there something larger you envision a cluster being able to do? > > The main thing I would like to see is for a way to go...

@7596ff Re-requested review since I have answered or resolved all open comments @Erk- Re-requested review, all comments addressed other than the cluster alternative request which is WIP @vilgotf Re-requested review

Added cluster alternative + example code to crate docs on the PR todo

nits addressed. does anyone have comments about the overall direction of the pr as a whole