Spring Projects Issues

**[Rossen Stoyanchev](https://jira.spring.io/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=rstoya05-aop)** commented Now that `ServerRequest` has an option and #20546 adds the same controllers methods, this is less critical for 5.0 GA. I'm postponing for 5.1.

**[Rossen Stoyanchev](https://jira.spring.io/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=rstoya05-aop)** commented This sounds like a duplicate of #18233. In 4.3 already consult the ContentNegotiationManager with which you can register extensions. If using the MVC config, which is the...

**[Oliver Drotbohm](https://jira.spring.io/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=olivergierke)** commented Looking at the JavaDoc for `ContentNegotiationManager` I think we're talking about different use cases. The one I am describing doesn't necessarily expose the media type to be...

**[Rossen Stoyanchev](https://jira.spring.io/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=rstoya05-aop)** commented Oops, #18233 is about `ResourceHttpRequestHandler` where this one here is about `ResourceHttpMessageConverter`. That said I think we can do exactly the same. See what we did in...

**[Oliver Drotbohm](https://jira.spring.io/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=olivergierke)** commented Do you oversee what would be necessary for Boot to integrate with that? From what I can see, it currently only looks up a `CNM` in the...

**[Juergen Hoeller](https://jira.spring.io/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=juergen.hoeller)** commented As for the existing behavior, a repeatable annotation is technically a container annotation with nested conditions inside... and unless we specifically check for that through the corresponding...

**[Rossen Stoyanchev](https://jira.spring.io/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=rstoya05-aop)** commented We've already looked into supporting RFC 6570. It's very extensive and arguably well beyond most needs. Even the spec recognizes that and defines itself in terms of...

**[Stefan Kühnel](https://jira.spring.io/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=stefan.kuehnel)** commented Hello `@Rossen` Stoyanchev, thanks for the update and the links. In the REST scenario we have we had a ressource like Customer. The URI design looks like...

**[Rossen Stoyanchev](https://jira.spring.io/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=rstoya05-aop)** commented We can consider an alternative `UriTemplateHandler` that supports a limited subset of the RFC based on the given list of operators. Probably taking a similar approach as...

**[Stefan Kühnel](https://jira.spring.io/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=stefan.kuehnel)** commented Thanks, Rossen, this sounds very good to me. :-)