Bob Aman

It's been awhile since I dived into the URI template spec. @therabidbanana wrote the current implementation, so if he can answer, awesome. Otherwise I need to dedicate some time to...

What version of Addressable are you using? I can't duplicate.

Nope, still can't duplicate. Provide a minimal working example of the bug please.

Could you write a test that reproduces this problem?

Thank you, that helps a lot.

@dmitry It's come up before and as before, the answer is essentially no, won't fix. If Ruby adds an indifferent access hash structure to the standard library, I'll revisit that...

`normalized_query(:sorted)` and `normalized_query()` behave the way you'd expect, but there's no analog for `query_values`. Ruby's hashes have not always been ordered, and until very recently, Addressable had explicit support for...

/cc @therabidbanana

@therabidbanana is currently the template expert at this point, pulling him in. My knowledge of the final version of the RFC is not what it should be since I didn't...

This isn't a scenario covered by the spec? I'd have assumed the answer would be unambiguous according to the spec actually.