spoignant-proton

Hi @hellt and thanks for your reply, That's interesting, because in your case you also have the same MAC address but the LLA are different, with the one on the...

So the way the configuration is loaded (either directly using `startup-config`, or by our own means after the container is created to overcome size limit) is unrelated with this issue....

FYI i'm using the latest clab version: ``` version: 0.59.0 commit: 9e964727 date: 2024-10-23T02:44:27Z source: https://github.com/srl-labs/containerlab rel. notes: https://containerlab.dev/rn/0.59/ ```

Stages were also meant to have certain parts of the network start before others, e.g. have a ready core layer before starting fabrics. I've tried removing those and replacing with...

As expected, after removing the `stages` section from all srl nodes, with `--max-workers 4`, i'm still hitting the issue: ``` admin@SPINE01:~$ ip netns exec srbase ip a ls dev e1-1...

Well even without `stages` and `--max-workers` the problem still affects a few interfaces randomly for a moderately sized topology. For example, one uplink on that leaf is affected, the other...

Hi @hellt, so i just made a few attempts at reproducing with the topology described [here](https://github.com/srl-labs/containerlab/issues/2280#issuecomment-2459427482) on a setup running latest clab and 24.10 srl, and it seems i no...